lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/13] selinux: Cleanup printk logging in conditional
From
Date
On 06/12/2018 04:38 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 10:09 +0200, Peter Enderborg wrote:
>> Replace printk with pr_* to avoid checkpatch warnings.
> I believe it would be nicer to remove the
> "SELinux: " prefix embbeded in each format
> and use a specific
>
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "SELinux: " fmt
>
> to automatically prefix these formats.
I cant argument about that, however some of the warnings and debug prints in this set does not have this
so it will then change the actual output. (And I also think that they should have a the prefix, but I don't
know why they don't) So I am not sure if it appropriate for a cleanup patch, it supposed to have no functional change.
>> diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c b/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
> []
>> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ int evaluate_cond_node(struct policydb *p, struct cond_node *node)
>> if (new_state != node->cur_state) {
>> node->cur_state = new_state;
>> if (new_state == -1)
>> - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: expression result was undefined - disabling all rules.\n");
>> + pr_err("SELinux: expression result was undefined - disabling all rules.\n");
>> /* turn the rules on or off */
>> for (cur = node->true_list; cur; cur = cur->next) {
>> if (new_state <= 0)
> So, for instance, this patch could become:
> (etc and so forth for each patch in this series)
>
> ---
> security/selinux/ss/conditional.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c b/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
> index c91543a617ac..e96820d92b61 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
> * the Free Software Foundation, version 2.
> */
>
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "SELinux: " fmt
> +
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
> @@ -96,7 +98,7 @@ int evaluate_cond_node(struct policydb *p, struct cond_node *node)
> if (new_state != node->cur_state) {
> node->cur_state = new_state;
> if (new_state == -1)
> - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: expression result was undefined - disabling all rules.\n");
> + pr_err("expression result was undefined - disabling all rules\n");
> /* turn the rules on or off */
> for (cur = node->true_list; cur; cur = cur->next) {
> if (new_state <= 0)
> @@ -287,7 +289,7 @@ static int cond_insertf(struct avtab *a, struct avtab_key *k, struct avtab_datum
> */
> if (k->specified & AVTAB_TYPE) {
> if (avtab_search(&p->te_avtab, k)) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: type rule already exists outside of a conditional.\n");
> + pr_err("type rule already exists outside of a conditional\n");
> goto err;
> }
> /*
> @@ -302,7 +304,7 @@ static int cond_insertf(struct avtab *a, struct avtab_key *k, struct avtab_datum
> node_ptr = avtab_search_node(&p->te_cond_avtab, k);
> if (node_ptr) {
> if (avtab_search_node_next(node_ptr, k->specified)) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: too many conflicting type rules.\n");
> + pr_err("too many conflicting type rules\n");
> goto err;
> }
> found = 0;
> @@ -313,13 +315,13 @@ static int cond_insertf(struct avtab *a, struct avtab_key *k, struct avtab_datum
> }
> }
> if (!found) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: conflicting type rules.\n");
> + pr_err("conflicting type rules\n");
> goto err;
> }
> }
> } else {
> if (avtab_search(&p->te_cond_avtab, k)) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: conflicting type rules when adding type rule for true.\n");
> + pr_err("conflicting type rules when adding type rule for true\n");
> goto err;
> }
> }
> @@ -327,7 +329,7 @@ static int cond_insertf(struct avtab *a, struct avtab_key *k, struct avtab_datum
>
> node_ptr = avtab_insert_nonunique(&p->te_cond_avtab, k, d);
> if (!node_ptr) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: could not insert rule.\n");
> + pr_err("could not insert rule\n");
> rc = -ENOMEM;
> goto err;
> }
> @@ -387,12 +389,12 @@ static int cond_read_av_list(struct policydb *p, void *fp, struct cond_av_list *
> static int expr_isvalid(struct policydb *p, struct cond_expr *expr)
> {
> if (expr->expr_type <= 0 || expr->expr_type > COND_LAST) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: conditional expressions uses unknown operator.\n");
> + pr_err("conditional expressions uses unknown operator\n");
> return 0;
> }
>
> if (expr->bool > p->p_bools.nprim) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: conditional expressions uses unknown bool.\n");
> + pr_err("conditional expressions uses unknown bool\n");
> return 0;
> }
> return 1;
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-13 08:23    [W:0.066 / U:6.652 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site