lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH][V2] drm/i915/guc: fix GEM_BUG_ON check
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 05:46:53PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The check for level being less than zero always false because flags
> is currently unsigned and can never be negative. Fix this by making
> flags a s32.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1468363 ("Macro compares unsigned to 0")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> ---
> V2: Make flags s32 rather than remove the GEM_BUG_ON check, thanks to
> Ville Syrjälä for spotting the mistake in my first attempt.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
> index 116f4ccf1bbd..fb31f5004bcf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
> @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ void intel_guc_fini(struct intel_guc *guc)
> static u32 get_log_control_flags(void)
> {
> u32 level = i915_modparams.guc_log_level;
> - u32 flags = 0;
> + s32 flags = 0;
>
> GEM_BUG_ON(level < 0);

Only insane people use "s32" when it's not part of the hardware spec and
you changed the wrong variable...

regards,
dan carpenter

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-12 11:11    [W:0.028 / U:2.120 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site