lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [lustre-devel] [PATCH] staging: lustre: delete the filesystem from the tree.
Date
Would it makes sense to land LNet and LNDs on their own first?  Get the networking house in order first before layering on the file system?

Doug

> On Jun 1, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> wrote:
>
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 7:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> all that churn without much visible progress to a mergeable codebase
>> was really ennoying.
>>
>> I'd recommend if people want to merge lustre they start with a managable
>> subset first, e.g. the fs client code with simple IP-only networking.
>
> Adding or removing the IB networking makes basically no difference to the
> code size. This would also make the client much less useful, since a large
> number of sites use Lustre with IB networks.
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-devel mailing list
> lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-01 20:36    [W:0.062 / U:11.788 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site