lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] drm/amdgpu: Add documentation for PRIME related code
From
Date
On 2018-06-01 03:44 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> wrote:
>> On 2018-06-01 02:58 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> wrote:
>>>> From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
>>>
>>> Series is:
>>> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
>>
>> Thanks. Is it okay to merge all of these via the amdgpu tree, or should
>> I wait for an ack from Jon and/or core DRM maintainers for that?
>
> GPU documentation usually goes through the drm trees. You might want
> to push patch 1 (drm_mm.rst fix) via drm_misc, but the rest are can go
> in via the amdgpu tree since they are amdgpu specific.

I'd prefer merging all three patches together, since without patch 1,
patch 3 generates the warning below while generating documentation, and
the reference to the PRIME Buffer Sharing section doesn't work.

.../linux/Documentation/gpu/amdgpu.rst:2: WARNING: undefined label:
prime_buffer_sharing (if the link has no caption the label must precede
a section header)


--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-01 15:57    [W:1.133 / U:0.536 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site