lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PCI/AER: add pcie TLP header information in the tracepoint
From
Date
[ ... ]
>>> --- a/include/ras/ras_event.h
>>> +++ b/include/ras/ras_event.h
>>> @@ -298,30 +298,42 @@ TRACE_EVENT(non_standard_event,
>>> TRACE_EVENT(aer_event,
>>> TP_PROTO(const char *dev_name,
>>> const u32 status,
>>> - const u8 severity),
>>> + const u8 severity,
>>> + const u32 tlp_header_valid,
>>> + struct aer_header_log_regs *tlp),
>>>
>>> - TP_ARGS(dev_name, status, severity),
>>> + TP_ARGS(dev_name, status, severity, tlp_header_valid, tlp),
>>>
>>> TP_STRUCT__entry(
>>> __string( dev_name, dev_name )
>>> __field( u32, status )
>>> __field( u8, severity )
>>> + __field( u32, tlp_header_valid)
>
> I'm guessing tlp_header_valid is just a boolean. It's after severity
> which is just one byte long. Why not make this one byte as well,
> otherwise you are wasting 3 bytes.

Thanks Steven. Yes boolean is fine.

>
>
>>> + __array( u32, buf, 4 )
>>> ),
>>>
>>> TP_fast_assign(
>>> __assign_str(dev_name, dev_name);
>>> __entry->status = status;
>>> __entry->severity = severity;
>>> + __entry->tlp_header_valid = tlp_header_valid;
>
>>> + __entry->buf[0] = tlp->dw0;
>>> + __entry->buf[1] = tlp->dw1;
>>> + __entry->buf[2] = tlp->dw2;
>>> + __entry->buf[3] = tlp->dw3;
>
> Should this assignment be dependent on whether or not tlp_header_valid
> is true? Could tlp be pointing to some random memory if it isn't? What
> about:

Good catch! will do so.

>
> if ((__entry->tlp_header_valid = tlp_header_valid)) {
> __entry->buf[0] = tlp->dw0;
> __entry->buf[1] = tlp->dw1;
> __entry->buf[2] = tlp->dw2;
> __entry->buf[3] = tlp->dw3;
> }
>
>
>>> ),
>>>
>>> - TP_printk("%s PCIe Bus Error: severity=%s, %s\n",
>>> + TP_printk("%s PCIe Bus Error: severity=%s, %s, TLP Header=%s\n",
>>> __get_str(dev_name),
>>> __entry->severity == AER_CORRECTABLE ? "Corrected" :
>>> __entry->severity == AER_FATAL ?
>>> "Fatal" : "Uncorrected, non-fatal",
>>> __entry->severity == AER_CORRECTABLE ?
>>> __print_flags(__entry->status, "|", aer_correctable_errors) :
>>> - __print_flags(__entry->status, "|", aer_uncorrectable_errors))
>>> + __print_flags(__entry->status, "|", aer_uncorrectable_errors),
>>> + __entry->tlp_header_valid ?
>>> + __print_array(__entry->buf, 4, sizeof(unsigned int)) :
>
> Note, "sizeof" will be shown in the format file that perf and trace-cmd
> read to parse this event. They currently do not know how to parse that
> (although I could add that in the future).
>
> Since sizeof(unsigned int) is always 4 in Linux, just use 4.

Yes, I will make the aboves changes and send out V2 patch. Thank you for
your time and comments.

Thomas

>
> __print_array(__entry->buf, 4, 4)
>
> -- Steve
>
>
>>> + "Not available")
>>> );
>>>
>>> /*
>>> --
>>> 2.14.1
>>>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-08 15:25    [W:0.061 / U:1.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site