lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/6 v2] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: use GPIO lookup table
Date
On Wednesday, May 30, 2018 11:05:00 AM CEST Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Janusz,

Hi Boris,

> On Sat, 26 May 2018 00:20:45 +0200
> Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ...
> > Changes since v1:
> > - fix handling of devm_gpiod_get_optional() return values - thanks to
> > Andy Shevchenko.
>
> Can you put the changelog after the "---" separator so that it does not
> appear in the final commit message?

Yes, sure, sorry for that.

> > +err_gpiod:
> > + if (err == -ENODEV || err == -ENOENT)
> > + err = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>
> Hm, isn't it better to make gpiod_find() return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER)
> here [1]? At least, ENOENT should not be turned into EPROBE_DEFER,
> because it's returned when there's no entry matching the requested gpio
> in the lookup table, and deferring the probe won't solve this problem.

ENOENT is also returned when no matching lookup table is found. That may
happen if consumer dev_name stored in the table differs from dev_name assigned
to the consumer by its bus, the platform bus in this case. For that reason I
think the consumer dev_name should be initialized in the table after the
device is registered, when its actual dev_name can be obtained. If that device
registration happens after the driver is already registered, e.g., at
late_initcall, the device is probed before its lookup table is ready. For that
reason returning EPROBE_DEFER seems better to me even in the ENOENT case.

Thanks,
Janusz



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-30 19:43    [W:0.243 / U:6.452 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site