lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 07/10] sched/irq: add irq utilization tracking
From
Date
On 05/25/2018 03:12 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> interrupt and steal time are the only remaining activities tracked by
> rt_avg. Like for sched classes, we can use PELT to track their average
> utilization of the CPU. But unlike sched class, we don't track when
> entering/leaving interrupt; Instead, we take into account the time spent
> under interrupt context when we update rqs' clock (rq_clock_task).
> This also means that we have to decay the normal context time and account
> for interrupt time during the update.
>
> That's also important to note that because
> rq_clock == rq_clock_task + interrupt time
> and rq_clock_task is used by a sched class to compute its utilization, the
> util_avg of a sched class only reflects the utilization of the time spent
> in normal context and not of the whole time of the CPU. The utilization of
> interrupt gives an more accurate level of utilization of CPU.
> The CPU utilization is :
> avg_irq + (1 - avg_irq / max capacity) * /Sum avg_rq
>
> Most of the time, avg_irq is small and neglictible so the use of the
> approximation CPU utilization = /Sum avg_rq was enough

[...]

> @@ -7362,6 +7363,7 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
> }
> update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, 0);
> update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, 0);
> + update_irq_load_avg(rq, 0);

So this one decays the signals only in case the update_rq_clock_task()
didn't call update_irq_load_avg() because 'irq_delta + steal' is 0, right?

[...]

> diff --git a/kernel/sched/pelt.c b/kernel/sched/pelt.c
> index 3d5bd3a..d2e4f21 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/pelt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/pelt.c
> @@ -355,3 +355,41 @@ int update_dl_rq_load_avg(u64 now, struct rq *rq, int running)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * irq:
> + *
> + * util_sum = \Sum se->avg.util_sum but se->avg.util_sum is not tracked
> + * util_sum = cpu_scale * load_sum
> + * runnable_load_sum = load_sum
> + *
> + */
> +
> +int update_irq_load_avg(struct rq *rq, u64 running)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + /*
> + * We know the time that has been used by interrupt since last update
> + * but we don't when. Let be pessimistic and assume that interrupt has
> + * happened just before the update. This is not so far from reality
> + * because interrupt will most probably wake up task and trig an update
> + * of rq clock during which the metric si updated.
> + * We start to decay with normal context time and then we add the
> + * interrupt context time.
> + * We can safely remove running from rq->clock because
> + * rq->clock += delta with delta >= running

This is true as long update_irq_load_avg() with a 'running != 0' is
called only after rq->clock moved forward (rq->clock += delta) (which is
true for update_rq_clock()->update_rq_clock_task()).

> + */
> + ret = ___update_load_sum(rq->clock - running, rq->cpu, &rq->avg_irq,
> + 0,
> + 0,
> + 0);
> + ret += ___update_load_sum(rq->clock, rq->cpu, &rq->avg_irq,
> + 1,
> + 1,
> + 1);

So you decay the signal in [sa->lut, rq->clock - running] (assumed to be
the portion of delta used by the task scheduler) and you increase it in
[rq->clock - running, rq->clock] (irq and virt portion of delta).

That means that this signal is updated on rq->clock whereas the others
are on rq->clock_task.

What about the ever growing clock diff between them? I see e.g ~6s after
20min uptime and up to 1.5ms 'running'.

It should be still safe to sum the sched class and irq signal in
sugov_aggregate_util() because they are independent, I guess.

[...]

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-30 17:56    [W:0.173 / U:0.276 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site