[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree
On 5/29/18 2:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Meh. Do we really need these switch to octal patches to start
> with? I mean, I personally prefer octal, but just switching around
> in random code that isn't otherwise changed creates nothing but churn.

This is exactly why I hesitated doing it, I knew it would end up
with conflicts. The main reason was to get rid of the inconsistency,
since we had a fair mix of octal and symbolic names.

Jens Axboe

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-29 16:23    [W:0.066 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site