lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC v5 3/5] virtio_ring: add packed ring support
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:18:57AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2018年05月22日 16:16, Tiwei Bie wrote:
[...]
> > +static void detach_buf_packed(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> > + unsigned int id, void **ctx)
> > +{
> > + struct vring_desc_state_packed *state;
> > + struct vring_packed_desc *desc;
> > + unsigned int i;
> > + int *next;
> > +
> > + /* Clear data ptr. */
> > + vq->desc_state_packed[id].data = NULL;
> > +
> > + next = &id;
> > + for (i = 0; i < vq->desc_state_packed[id].num; i++) {
> > + state = &vq->desc_state_packed[*next];
> > + vring_unmap_state_packed(vq, state);
> > + next = &vq->desc_state_packed[*next].next;
>
> Have a short discussion with Michael. It looks like the only thing we care
> is DMA address and length here.

The length tracked by desc_state_packed[] is also necessary
when INDIRECT is used and the buffers are writable.

>
> So a thought is to avoid using desc_state_packed() is vring_use_dma_api() is
> false? Probably need another id allocator or just use desc_state_packed for
> free id list.

I think it's a good suggestion. Thanks!

I won't track the addr/len/flags for non-indirect descs
when vring_use_dma_api() returns false.

>
> > + }
> > +
> > + vq->vq.num_free += vq->desc_state_packed[id].num;
> > + *next = vq->free_head;
>
> Using pointer seems not elegant and unnecessary here. You can just track
> next in integer I think?

It's possible to use integer, but will need one more var
to track `prev` (desc_state_packed[prev].next == next in
this case).

>
> > + vq->free_head = id;
> > +
> > + if (vq->indirect) {
> > + u32 len;
> > +
> > + /* Free the indirect table, if any, now that it's unmapped. */
> > + desc = vq->desc_state_packed[id].indir_desc;
> > + if (!desc)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + len = vq->desc_state_packed[id].len;
> > + for (i = 0; i < len / sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc); i++)
> > + vring_unmap_desc_packed(vq, &desc[i]);
> > +
> > + kfree(desc);
> > + vq->desc_state_packed[id].indir_desc = NULL;
> > + } else if (ctx) {
> > + *ctx = vq->desc_state_packed[id].indir_desc;
> > + }
> > }
> > static inline bool more_used_packed(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq)
> > {
> > - return false;
> > + u16 last_used, flags;
> > + u8 avail, used;
> > +
> > + last_used = vq->last_used_idx;
> > + flags = virtio16_to_cpu(vq->vq.vdev,
> > + vq->vring_packed.desc[last_used].flags);
> > + avail = !!(flags & VRING_DESC_F_AVAIL(1));
> > + used = !!(flags & VRING_DESC_F_USED(1));
> > +
> > + return avail == used && used == vq->used_wrap_counter;
>
> Spec does not check avail == used? So there's probably a bug in either of
> the two places.
>
> In what condition that avail != used but used == vq_used_wrap_counter? A
> buggy device or device set the two bits in two writes?

Currently, spec doesn't forbid devices to set the status
bits as: avail != used but used == vq_used_wrap_counter.
So I think driver cannot assume this won't happen.

>
> > }
[...]
> > static unsigned virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > {
> > - return 0;
> > + struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> > +
> > + START_USE(vq);
> > +
> > + /* We optimistically turn back on interrupts, then check if there was
> > + * more to do. */
> > +
> > + if (vq->event_flags_shadow == VRING_EVENT_F_DISABLE) {
> > + virtio_wmb(vq->weak_barriers);
>
> Missing comments for the barrier.

Will add some comments.

>
> > + vq->event_flags_shadow = VRING_EVENT_F_ENABLE;
> > + vq->vring_packed.driver->flags = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev,
> > + vq->event_flags_shadow);
> > + }
> > +
> > + END_USE(vq);
> > + return vq->last_used_idx;
> > }
> > static bool virtqueue_poll_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned last_used_idx)
> > {
> > - return false;
> > + struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> > + u8 avail, used;
> > + u16 flags;
> > +
> > + virtio_mb(vq->weak_barriers);
> > + flags = virtio16_to_cpu(vq->vq.vdev,
> > + vq->vring_packed.desc[last_used_idx].flags);
> > + avail = !!(flags & VRING_DESC_F_AVAIL(1));
> > + used = !!(flags & VRING_DESC_F_USED(1));
> > +
> > + return avail == used && used == vq->used_wrap_counter;
> > }
> > static bool virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > {
> > - return false;
> > + struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> > +
> > + START_USE(vq);
> > +
> > + /* We optimistically turn back on interrupts, then check if there was
> > + * more to do. */
> > +
> > + if (vq->event_flags_shadow == VRING_EVENT_F_DISABLE) {
> > + virtio_wmb(vq->weak_barriers);
>
> Need comments for the barrier.

Will add some comments.

Best regards,
Tiwei Bie

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-29 07:12    [W:0.053 / U:2.436 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site