Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Introduce QCOM CPUFREQ FW bindings | From | Taniya Das <> | Date | Mon, 28 May 2018 12:59:51 +0530 |
| |
Hello Rob,
Could you please suggest if the below looks okay to be implemented?
On 5/24/2018 11:13 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 24-05-18, 10:48, Taniya Das wrote: >> Hello Rob, Viresh, >> >> Thank you for the comments. If I understand correctly, the device tree nodes >> should look something like the below. >> >> Though I am not sure if any vendor name could be associated in the cpu >> nodes. > > Well Rob said Yes to that I think. > >> Please suggest if my understanding is wrong. >> >> cpu@0 { >> qcom,freq-domain = <&freq_domain_table0>; >> … >> }; >> >> same follows for cpu 1/2/3 >> >> cpu@400 { >> qcom,freq-domain = <&freq_domain_table1>; >> … >> }; >> same follows for cpu 5/6/7 >> >> freq_domain_table0 : freq_table { >> reg = < >, < >, < > ; >> reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base"; >> }; >> >> freq_domain_table1 : freq_table { >> reg = < >, < >, < > ; >> reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base"; >> }; > > Mostly yes. >
-- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
| |