lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Introduce QCOM CPUFREQ FW bindings
From
Date
Hello Rob,

Could you please suggest if the below looks okay to be implemented?

On 5/24/2018 11:13 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24-05-18, 10:48, Taniya Das wrote:
>> Hello Rob, Viresh,
>>
>> Thank you for the comments. If I understand correctly, the device tree nodes
>> should look something like the below.
>>
>> Though I am not sure if any vendor name could be associated in the cpu
>> nodes.
>
> Well Rob said Yes to that I think.
>
>> Please suggest if my understanding is wrong.
>>
>> cpu@0 {
>> qcom,freq-domain = <&freq_domain_table0>;
>> …
>> };
>>
>> same follows for cpu 1/2/3
>>
>> cpu@400 {
>> qcom,freq-domain = <&freq_domain_table1>;
>> …
>> };
>> same follows for cpu 5/6/7
>>
>> freq_domain_table0 : freq_table {
>> reg = < >, < >, < > ;
>> reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base";
>> };
>>
>> freq_domain_table1 : freq_table {
>> reg = < >, < >, < > ;
>> reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base";
>> };
>
> Mostly yes.
>

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.

--

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-28 09:30    [W:0.184 / U:0.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site