Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 24 May 2018 11:52:06 +0100 | From | Mark Rutland <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 02/14] arm64: Call ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 on transitions between EL0 and EL1 |
| |
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:23:20AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On 05/22/2018 04:06 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S > > index ec2ee720e33e..f33e6aed3037 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ > > * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. > > */ > > +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h> > > #include <linux/init.h> > > #include <linux/linkage.h> > > @@ -137,6 +138,18 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif > > add \dst, \dst, #(\sym - .entry.tramp.text) > > .endm > > + // This macro corrupts x0-x3. It is the caller's duty > > + // to save/restore them if required. > > NIT: Shouldn't you use /* ... */ for multi-line comments?
There's no requirement to do so, and IIRC even Torvalds prefers '//' comments for multi-line things these days.
Mark.
| |