Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: tegra20: Fix imbalanced clock enable count | Date | Thu, 24 May 2018 11:36:59 +0200 |
| |
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 11:30:39 AM CEST Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > On 23.05.2018 08:58, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 23-05-18, 00:14, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > >> Tegra20-cpufreq driver missed enabling the CPU clocks. This results in a > >> clock-enable refcount disbalance on PLL_P <-> PLL_X reparent, causing > >> PLL_X to get disabled while it shouldn't. Fix this by enabling the clocks > >> on the driver probe. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> > >> --- > >> > >> CPUFreq maintainers, > >> > >> Please take into account that this patch is made on top of my recent > >> series of patches [0] "Clean up Tegra20 cpufreq driver" that was fully > >> reviewed, but seems not applied yet. Let me know if you prefer to re-spin > >> the [0], including this patch into the series. > >> > >> [0] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/list/?series=45321 > > > > This is already picked by Rafael and is sitting in pm/bleeding-edge > > branch. Should get merged into linux-next in a day or two. > > Neat, thank you for letting me know.
It actually is there in my linux-next branch, but linux-next proper is not taking new material this week AFAICS.
You'll see this in linux-next on Monday, most probably.
| |