lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Revert "dmaengine: pl330: add DMA_PAUSE feature"
On 21-05-18, 20:56, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 5:16 AM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> I understand the residue can't be read after terminate, that's why
> >> reading the residue is step 2 in pause/residue/terminate. My question
> >> was whether the entire sequence pause/residue/terminate taken as a
> >> whole can or cannot lose data. Saying that individual steps can or
> >> can't lose data is not enough, context is required. The key point is
> >> whether pause flushes in-flight data to its destination or not. If it
> >> does, and our residue is accurate, the terminate cannot cause data
> >> loss. If pause doesn't flush, an additional step of flush_sync as
> >> Lars suggested is required. So pause/flush_sync/residue/terminate
> >> would be the safe sequence that cannot lose data.
> >
> > I wouldn't use cannot, shouldn't would be better here as it depends on HW and
> > where all data has been buffered and if it can be flushed or not.
> >
> > Have you checked if pl330 supports such flushing?
>
> It does not, at least in the context of pausing. The dma-330 DMAEND
> instruction flushes in-flight data to its destination, and there are
> read/write barrier instructions also, but none of them can be injected
> on the fly into a running dma thread. DMAKILL can be, but it discards
> in-flight data. Currently, if an 8250 serial driver uses the pl330
> for rx dma, the result is possible data loss/corruption. If there was
> a stronger pause capability, call it "cmd_sync_pause" which guaranteed
> flushing of in-flight data to its destination and accurate residue
> reading when paused, then the 8250 serial driver could check for
> "cmd_sync_pause" and reject dma drivers that do not have that
> capability. pl330.c would not advertise cmd_sync_pause. I don't know
> if other dmaengine hardware would be able to support cmd_sync_pause or
> not, I'm mostly just familiar with the pl330. The ep93xx_dma.c driver
> for example has a m2p_hw_synchronize function which seems to do a
> flush.

Well looks like even adding support for sync_pause doesn't solve your issue on
pl330. Do you want to move this to PIO mode then..?

--
~Vinod

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-22 05:38    [W:0.073 / U:9.648 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site