lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v10 25/27] ARM: davinci: add device tree support to timer
From
Date
On 05/18/2018 01:05 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Thursday 17 May 2018 08:39 PM, David Lechner wrote:
>> On 05/17/2018 09:35 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> On Wednesday 09 May 2018 10:56 PM, David Lechner wrote:
>>>> This adds device tree support to the davinci timer so that when clocks
>>>> are moved to device tree, the timer will still work.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>>> +static int __init of_davinci_timer_init(struct device_node *np)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    struct clk *clk;
>>>> +
>>>> +    clk = of_clk_get(np, 0);
>>>> +    if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
>>>> +        struct of_phandle_args clkspec;
>>>> +
>>>> +        /*
>>>> +         * Fall back to using ref_clk if the actual clock is not
>>>> +         * available. There will be problems later if the real clock
>>>> +         * source is disabled.
>>>> +         */
>>>> +
>>>> +        pr_warn("%s: falling back to ref_clk\n", __func__);
>>>> +
>>>> +        clkspec.np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "ref_clk");
>>>> +        if (IS_ERR(clkspec.np)) {
>>>> +            pr_err("%s: No clock available for timer!\n", __func__);
>>>> +            return PTR_ERR(clkspec.np);
>>>> +        }
>>>> +        clk = of_clk_get_from_provider(&clkspec);
>>>> +        of_node_put(clkspec.np);
>>>> +    }
>>>
>>> Do we need this error path now?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sekhar
>>>
>>
>> No, not really.
>
> Then lets just print an error and return the error number.
>

OK. FYI, timer_probe() prints the error if we return and error, so
I will just return the error.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-18 17:36    [W:0.071 / U:1.488 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site