lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 4.14 41/45] xfrm: Use __skb_queue_tail in xfrm_trans_queue
Date
4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

commit d16b46e4fd8bc6063624605f25b8c0835bb1fbe3 upstream.

We do not need locking in xfrm_trans_queue because it is designed
to use per-CPU buffers. However, the original code incorrectly
used skb_queue_tail which takes the lock. This patch switches
it to __skb_queue_tail instead.

Reported-and-tested-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Fixes: acf568ee859f ("xfrm: Reinject transport-mode packets...")
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Strachan <astrachan@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ int xfrm_trans_queue(struct sk_buff *skb
return -ENOBUFS;

XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(skb)->finish = finish;
- skb_queue_tail(&trans->queue, skb);
+ __skb_queue_tail(&trans->queue, skb);
tasklet_schedule(&trans->tasklet);
return 0;
}

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-18 10:57    [W:0.148 / U:5.880 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site