lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] misc: kgdbts: silence array underflow warning
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:22:29PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Smatch distrusts simple_strtol(). I don't know the code well enough
> to say if the distrust is justified here, but it seems harmless to
> silence the warning.

What warning does this fix? I'd prefer to have it in the description.


> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/kgdbts.c b/drivers/misc/kgdbts.c
> index 6193270e7b3d..e0508acaedaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/kgdbts.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/kgdbts.c
> @@ -400,13 +400,15 @@ static void skip_back_repeat_test(char *arg)
> int go_back = simple_strtol(arg, NULL, 10);

If go_back is out of range then this is a serious error in the test
plans found in the module. Something simple and clear such as
BUG_ON(go_back <= 0 || go_back > ts.idx) is probably sufficient.


> repeat_test--;
> - if (repeat_test <= 0) {
> + if (repeat_test <= 0 || go_back < 0) {

The BUG_ON() will mess things up because whatever breakpoints
the test is using are still enabled.

If you really want to recover cleanly then perhaps:

+ if (repeat_test <= 0 || WARN_ON(go_back < 0 || go_back > ts.idx)) {


> ts.idx++;
> } else {
> if (repeat_test % 100 == 0)
> v1printk("kgdbts:RUN ... %d remaining\n", repeat_test);
>
> ts.idx -= go_back;
> + if (ts.idx < 0)
> + ts.idx = 0;

Not sure about this. If we know the opcodes are bad then re-executing
them doesn't seem like a good idea (hence covering it in the WARN_ON
branch above).


Daniel.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-17 15:32    [W:0.030 / U:0.504 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site