lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 06/11] cpufreq: tegra20: Remove unneeded check in tegra_cpu_init
    On 17-05-18, 21:00, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
    > Remove checking of the CPU number for consistency as it won't ever fail
    > unless there is a severe bug in the cpufreq core.
    >
    > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
    > ---
    > drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c | 5 -----
    > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
    >
    > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
    > index 61f00d1cba26..147ae3e14f18 100644
    > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
    > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
    > @@ -32,8 +32,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table freq_table[] = {
    > { .frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END },
    > };
    >
    > -#define NUM_CPUS 2
    > -
    > static struct clk *cpu_clk;
    > static struct clk *pll_x_clk;
    > static struct clk *pll_p_clk;
    > @@ -119,9 +117,6 @@ static int tegra_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
    > {
    > int ret;
    >
    > - if (policy->cpu >= NUM_CPUS)
    > - return -EINVAL;
    > -
    > clk_prepare_enable(cpu_clk);
    >
    > /* FIXME: what's the actual transition time? */

    Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

    --
    viresh

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2018-05-18 04:00    [W:4.062 / U:0.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site