Messages in this thread | | | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | Date | Wed, 16 May 2018 19:40:43 +0200 | Subject | Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the pinctrl tree |
| |
Hi Linus,
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 1:33 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 1:29 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven > <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: >> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: >>> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven >>> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: >>>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: >>>>> Commit >>>>> >>>>> f18fab4bcb4f ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: Add r8a77470 PFC support") >>>>> >>>>> is missing a Signed-off-by from its comitter. >>>> >>>> Sorry, I forgot to add it. >>>> >>>> Linus, as the merge of sh-pfc is your top commit, shall I fix it up >>>> and send a new >>>> pull request? >>>> Please let me know how to proceed. Thanks! >>> >>> If it's just missing your SoB I can add it with your permission >>> I guess? That is less trouble. >> >> You have my permission. >> But I'm afraid that won't help, as then you'll become the committer with your >> SoB missing... > > Bah I just sign them all off then. It's still quicker. > > Done!
Thanks! I'll be more careful next time.
I guess I should base my next pull request on the new commit 73dacc3403436fc2 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: Add r8a77470 PFC support") in your tree, instead of on my previous pull request? Else there will be some conflicts (I checked: so far in one file only).
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| |