[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] clk: boston: fix memory leak of 'onecell' on error return paths
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:28:40AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Dan Carpenter (2018-05-09 23:59:51)
> > It would be nice to make things static check clean. One idea would be
> > that the static checker could ignore resource leaks in __init functions.
> >
> Typically if the stuff is so important that it doesn't work without it
> then we throw in a panic() or a BUG() call to indicate that all hope is
> lost. Otherwise, I'm not sure what's wrong with adding in proper error
> paths for clean recovery.

In clk_boston_setup() then we'd have to put a ton of BUG()s in there to
silence all the warnings. Right now the static checkers only care about
kmalloc() but in a year or two they'll be clever enough to care about
everything leaked in this function. I don't think adding BUG() calls
is a good idea.

Plus, I have a private static checker warning for that. When the BTRFS
filesystem was merged 10 years ago it used to call BUG() all the time if
allocations failed so I made a static checker warning to spot that

dan carpenter

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-16 13:46    [W:0.030 / U:7.692 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site