Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 16 May 2018 16:32:27 -0700 | From | rishabhb@codeauro ... | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: Documentation for qcom, llcc |
| |
On 2018-05-16 11:08, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting rishabhb@codeaurora.org (2018-05-16 10:33:14) >> On 2018-05-16 10:03, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> > Quoting Rishabh Bhatnagar (2018-05-08 13:22:00) >> >> >> + >> >> +- max-slices: >> >> + usage: required >> >> + Value Type: <u32> >> >> + Definition: Number of cache slices supported by hardware >> >> + >> >> +Example: >> >> + >> >> + llcc: qcom,llcc@1100000 { >> > >> > cache-controller@1100000 ? >> > >> We have tried to use consistent naming convention as in llcc_* >> everywhere. >> Using cache-controller will mix and match the naming convention. Also >> in >> the documentation it is explained what llcc is and its full form. >> > > DT prefers standard node names as opposed to vendor specific node > names. > Isn't it a cache controller? I fail to see why this can't be done. Hi Stephen, The driver is vendor specific and also for uniformity purposes we preferred to go with this name.
| |