lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: Documentation for qcom, llcc
On 2018-05-16 11:08, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting rishabhb@codeaurora.org (2018-05-16 10:33:14)
>> On 2018-05-16 10:03, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> > Quoting Rishabh Bhatnagar (2018-05-08 13:22:00)
>>
>> >> +
>> >> +- max-slices:
>> >> + usage: required
>> >> + Value Type: <u32>
>> >> + Definition: Number of cache slices supported by hardware
>> >> +
>> >> +Example:
>> >> +
>> >> + llcc: qcom,llcc@1100000 {
>> >
>> > cache-controller@1100000 ?
>> >
>> We have tried to use consistent naming convention as in llcc_*
>> everywhere.
>> Using cache-controller will mix and match the naming convention. Also
>> in
>> the documentation it is explained what llcc is and its full form.
>>
>
> DT prefers standard node names as opposed to vendor specific node
> names.
> Isn't it a cache controller? I fail to see why this can't be done.
Hi Stephen,
The driver is vendor specific and also for uniformity purposes we
preferred
to go with this name.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-17 01:32    [W:0.053 / U:3.868 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site