lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] rcu: Report a quiescent state when it's exactly in the state
From
Date
Hello folks,

I think I wrote the title in a misleading way.

Please change the title to something else such as,
"rcu: Report a quiescent state when it's in the state" or,
"rcu: Add points reporting quiescent states where proper" or so on.

On 2018-05-11 오후 5:30, Byungchul Park wrote:
> We expect a quiescent state of TASKS_RCU when cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs()
> is called, no matter whether it actually be scheduled or not. However,
> it currently doesn't report the quiescent state when the task enters
> into __schedule() as it's called with preempt = true. So make it report
> the quiescent state unconditionally when cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() is
> called.
>
> And in TINY_RCU, even though the quiescent state of rcu_bh also should
> be reported when the tick interrupt comes from user, it doesn't. So make
> it reported.
>
> Lastly in TREE_RCU, rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch() should be
> reported when the tick interrupt comes from not only user but also idle,
> as an extended quiescent state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
> ---
> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 4 ++--
> kernel/rcu/tiny.c | 6 +++---
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index ee8cf5fc..7432261 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -195,8 +195,8 @@ static inline void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) { }
> */
> #define cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() \
> do { \
> - if (!cond_resched()) \
> - rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch_lite(current); \
> + rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch_lite(current); \
> + cond_resched(); \
> } while (0)
>
> /*
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
> index a64eee0..68d2332 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
> @@ -120,12 +120,12 @@ void rcu_bh_qs(void)
> */
> void rcu_check_callbacks(int user)
> {
> - if (user)
> + if (user) {
> rcu_sched_qs();
> - else if (!in_softirq())
> rcu_bh_qs();
> - if (user)
> rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(current);
> + } else if (!in_softirq())
> + rcu_bh_qs();
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 36075dd..1abe29a 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -2595,6 +2595,7 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int user)
>
> rcu_sched_qs();
> rcu_bh_qs();
> + rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(current);
>
> } else if (!in_softirq()) {
>
> @@ -2610,8 +2611,7 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int user)
> rcu_preempt_check_callbacks();
> if (rcu_pending())
> invoke_rcu_core();
> - if (user)
> - rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(current);
> +
> trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("End scheduler-tick"));
> }
>
>

--
Thanks,
Byungchul

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-05-11 14:59    [W:0.041 / U:13.252 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site