lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: Hashed pointer issues
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:00 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 11:38 AM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Something like this? (Untested.)
>
> Looks workable.
>
>> + /* If we have hw RNG, start hashing immediately. */
>> + if (arch_has_random()) {
>> + get_random_bytes_arch(&ptr_key, sizeof(ptr_key));
>> + ptr_key_ready();
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>
> Small tweak: you should check the return value of get_random_bytes_arch(),
> because in theory it can fail.
>
> Sadly, that's not actually how get_random_bytes_arch() really works - it
> falls back on "get_random_bytes()" on failure instead, which is explicitly
> against the whole point here.

I just noticed: there are _no_ users of get_random_bytes_arch() ...
didn't we once use it to feed entropy to the CRNG?

> So I think it would need some tweaking, with a new function entirely
> (get_random_bytes_arch() with a failure return for "cannot fill buffer").
>
> But that would be just a few more lines, because we could make the existing
> get_random_bytes_arch() just use the failure-case thing.
>
> So add a "get_hw_random_bytes()" that does that same loop in
> get_random_bytes_arch(), but returns the number of bytes it filled in.
>
> Then get_random_bytes_arch() turns into
>
> got = get_hw_random_bytes(p, nbytes);
> if (got < nbytes)
> get_random_bytes(p+got, nbytes-got);
>
> and the initialize_ptr_random() use would be something like
>
> if (get_hw_random_bytes(&ptr_key, sizeof(ptr_key)) == sizeof(ptr_key)) {
> ptr_key_ready();
> return 0;
> }
>
> Hmm?
>
> Maybe we could call the "get_hw_random_bytes()" something like
> "get_early_random_bytes()" and the "use HW for it" is purely an
> implementation detail?

Yeah, and if we add __must_check, I think this should be fine. Ted,
any thoughts on this?

Tobin, is this something you've got time to implement and test?

-Kees

--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-30 21:16    [W:0.098 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site