Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: s390 perf events JSONs query | From | John Garry <> | Date | Fri, 20 Apr 2018 13:34:55 +0100 |
| |
On 20/04/2018 12:44, Thomas-Mich Richter wrote: > On 04/20/2018 12:51 PM, John Garry wrote: >> Hi Hendrik, Thomas, >> >> I noticed that in 4.17-rc1 support was included for s390 perf pmu-events. I also notice that the JSONs contain many common (identical actually) events between different chips for this arch. >> >> Support was added for factoring out common arch events in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/tools/perf/pmu-events?h=next-20180420&id=e9d32c1bf0cd7a98358ec4aa1625bf2b3459b9ac >> >> ARM64 chips use this feature. I am not familiar with the s390 arch, but do you think you could also use this feature? >> >> Thanks, >> John >> > > Thanks John, > > for bringing this to my attention. Yes I will definitely look into this feature and will try to > rework our s390 json files when this seems beneficial. > > I did not notice this patch on the linux-perf-users mailing list. Was it there for review? > I do ask this because recently I have nearly no traffic on this list in my reader, so I wonder > if there is something wrong with my mailing list subscription or setup. >
Hi Thomas,
The only relevant list was linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
This is the only list which the MAINTAINERS file advises to add. I did wonder about a dedicated perf list, as I seem to miss mails also.
Hi Peter, Ingo, Arnaldo,
Should linux-perf-users address be added for perf-related patches? If so, should we add it to the maintainers file? If not, why no dedicated list?
Thanks, John
> Thanks. >
| |