[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86/xen: Remove use of VLAs
On 04/13/2018 07:55 PM, David Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 03:11:46PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> There's an ongoing effort to remove VLAs[1] from the kernel to eventually
>> turn on -Wvla. The few VLAs in use have an upper bound based on a size
>> of 64K. This doesn't produce an excessively large stack so just switch
>> the upper bound.
>> [1]
> This comment is more in regards to many of these patches, and not as
> much this one specifically.
> How confident are we in the upper bounds we're setting, and how
> obvious is it in the resulting code so that something does later
> change to overflow these bounds.
> The danger here is that we're converting something a little easier to
> detect (a stack overflow), with something harder to detect
> (overflowing an array on the stack).

Several people have remarked on that and the solution has been to
put in some kind of WARN and/or error check to make it obvious something
needs to be adjusted.

> I guess the question is twofold: how did you determine that 64K was
> the largest 'size' value, and how should reviewers verify this as
> well.  Perhaps this should at least be in the commit text so someone
> tracking down something with this code can find it later.

It's not in the patch context but there's a large comment below:

* A GDT can be up to 64k in size, which corresponds to 8192
* 8-byte entries, or 16 4k pages..

BUG_ON(size > 65536);

Given the frames was calculated based off the size, that seemed

> David


 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-14 05:43    [W:0.192 / U:5.620 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site