lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Apr]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add a --strict test for structs with bool member definitions
Hi,

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:47:19AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > I still have room in my /dev/null mailbox for pure checkpatch patches.
> >
> > > (ooh, https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/21/384 is working this morning)
> >
> > Yes, we really should not use lkml.org for references. Sadly google
> > displays it very prominently when you search for something.
>
> lkml.org is nice in emails that have a short expected life time and relevance -
> but it probably shouldn't be used for permanent references such as kernel
> messages, code comments and Git log entries.

Is there a better or recommended way to reference posts on LKML in commit
messages? (I do like the idea of linking to previous discussions, results,
...)

Andrea


>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-04-12 11:36    [W:0.111 / U:0.320 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site