lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/3] clk: tegra: Mark HCLK, SCLK and EMC as critical
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 04:33:29PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 15.01.2018 13:56, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > On 10.01.2018 16:59, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> Machine dies if HCLK, SCLK or EMC is disabled. Hence mark these clocks
> >> as critical.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> >> Acked-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Change log:
> >> v2: Fixed accidentally missed marking EMC as critical on Tegra30 and
> >> Tegra124. Switched to a use of common EMC gate definition on Tegra20
> >> and Tegra30.
> >>
> >> v3: Dropped marking PLL_P outputs as critical, because seems they are
> >> not so critical. Although, I still haven't got a definitive answer
> >> about what exact HW functions are affected by the fixed-clocks.
> >> Anyway it should be cleaner to correct the actual drivers.
> >
> > Stephen / Michael, would it be possible to schedule these patches for 4.16? My
> > T20 and T30 devices aren't working without the 'critical clocks' patch. Things
> > happen to work with the opensource u-boot, but not with the proprietary
> > bootloader. It's probably not a big deal that out-of-tree devices are broken,
> > although would be nice to have one problem less.
>
> Guys, is there anything I could do to get these patches in linux-next?

I've picked these up into the for-4.17/clk branch in the Tegra tree. I
already have that branch for the MBIST patches which are a dependency
for the for-4.17/soc branch.

Stephen, Mike, let me know if you have any objections to carrying these
in the Tegra tree.

Thanks,
Thierry
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-08 15:45    [W:0.106 / U:5.204 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site