[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 13/13] arm64: topology: divorce MC scheduling domain from core_siblings

> Is there a good reason for diverging instead of adjusting the
> core_sibling mask? On x86 the core_siblings mask is defined by the last
> level cache span so they don't have this issue.

No. core_siblings is defined as the list of cores that have the same
physical_package_id (see the doc of sysfs topology files), and LLC can
be smaller than that.
Example with E5v3 with cluster-on-die (two L3 per package, core_siblings
is twice larger than L3 cpumap):
On AMD EPYC, you even have up to 8 LLC per package.


 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-08 21:42    [W:0.093 / U:26.484 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site