[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/7] lkdtm: crash on overwriting protected pmalloc var

On 06/03/18 19:20, J Freyensee wrote:

> On 2/28/18 12:06 PM, Igor Stoppa wrote:


>> void __init lkdtm_perms_init(void);
>> void lkdtm_WRITE_RO(void);
>> void lkdtm_WRITE_RO_AFTER_INIT(void);
>> +void lkdtm_WRITE_RO_PMALLOC(void);
> Does this need some sort of #ifdef too?

Not strictly. It's just a function declaration.
As long as it is not used, the linker will not complain.
The #ifdef placed around the use and definition is sufficient, from a
correctness perspective.

But it's a different question if there is any standard in linux about
hiding also the declaration.

I am not very fond of #ifdefs, so when I can I try to avoid them.

>> + pr_info("attempting bad pmalloc write at %p\n", i);
>> + *i = 0;
> OK, now I'm on the right version of this patch series, same comment
> applies.  I don't get the local *i assignment at the end of the
> function, but seems harmless.

Because that's the whole point of the function: prove that pmalloc
protection works (see the message in the pr_info one line above).

The function is supposed to do:

* create a pool
* allocate memory from it
* protect it
* try to alter it (and crash)

*i = 0; performs the last step


 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-07 14:20    [W:0.067 / U:1.076 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site