lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ubi: Reject MLC NAND
On Wed 2018-03-07 22:11:13, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 14:08 -0800, Steve deRosier wrote:
> >
> > To clarify one thing: the reason for this is MLC has actually never
> > been supported, nor worked properly. The fact that it kinda worked was
> > incidental and the cause of major problems for people due to that not
> > being clear. This patch only makes it explicit and avoids people
> > mistakenly trying to use UBIFS on MLC flash and risking their data and
> > products. To me, that's what's important.
> >
> > This is an important patch, even if all it does is keep people from
> > loosing data. It also changes the conversation from "I have a
> > corrupted UBIFS device, BTW it's on MLC..." to "What can we do to get
> > UBIFS to work on MLC".

Well, for -stable I'd suggest printk(KERN_ALERT ...) but keep the
system running.

> This is a bug fix.
>
> UBI on MLC never worked. It was a bug that we ever permitted it. This
> is now fixed.

Yeah, well, so lets say I have a working hardware (maybe using
read-only UBI on MLC), update to next stable kernel, and now kernel
refuses to see the partition.

I'll certainly not consider this patch a bug fix.

Removing support for hardware that "only works by mistake" may be good
idea, but maybe it is slightly too surprising for a -stable.

Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-07 23:18    [W:0.061 / U:4.604 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site