lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 4.14 100/101] bpf: skip unnecessary capability check
Date
4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Chenbo Feng <fengc@google.com>

commit 0fa4fe85f4724fff89b09741c437cbee9cf8b008 upstream.

The current check statement in BPF syscall will do a capability check
for CAP_SYS_ADMIN before checking sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled. This
code path will trigger unnecessary security hooks on capability checking
and cause false alarms on unprivileged process trying to get CAP_SYS_ADMIN
access. This can be resolved by simply switch the order of the statement
and CAP_SYS_ADMIN is not required anyway if unprivileged bpf syscall is
allowed.

Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng <fengc@google.com>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -1455,7 +1455,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(bpf, int, cmd, union bpf
union bpf_attr attr = {};
int err;

- if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled)
+ if (sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;

err = check_uarg_tail_zero(uattr, sizeof(attr), size);

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-27 19:17    [W:0.252 / U:1.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site