Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4.15 000/128] 4.15.11-stable review | From | Guenter Roeck <> | Date | Sun, 18 Mar 2018 22:36:20 -0700 |
| |
On 03/18/2018 08:39 PM, Dan Rue wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 12:15:23PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:25:26AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:22:21PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.11 release. >>>> There are 128 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>>> let me know. >>>> >>>> Responses should be made by Sun Mar 18 15:22:57 UTC 2018. >>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>>> >>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.15.11-rc1.gz >>> >>> -rc2 is out to fix a build error on some configs: >>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.15.11-rc2.gz >> >> And -rc3 is out that at least builds properly: >> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.15.11-rc3.gz > > Sorry to say, this one doesn't build properly either. > > I tested the previous build issue on arm64 only, but arm32 is still > failing on 4.14/4.15 due to the following: > > 07f498834a53 ("clk: ti: clkctrl: add support for retrying failed init") > > I'll reply to the patch directly as well. > > $ make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- O=build-arm multi_v7_defconfig > $ make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- O=build-arm > > ... > > ../drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c: In function ‘_ti_omap4_clkctrl_setup’: > ../drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c:497:27: error: passing argument 2 of ‘ti_clk_retry_init’ from incompatible pointer type > [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] > ti_clk_retry_init(node, provider, _clkctrl_add_provider); > ^~~~~~~~ > In file included from ../drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c:24:0: > ../drivers/clk/ti/clock.h:265:5: note: expected ‘struct clk_hw *’ but argument is of type ‘struct omap_clkctrl_prov > ider *’ > int ti_clk_retry_init(struct device_node *node, struct clk_hw *hw, > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c:497:37: error: passing argument 3 of ‘ti_clk_retry_init’ from incompatible pointer type > [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] > ti_clk_retry_init(node, provider, _clkctrl_add_provider); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from ../drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c:24:0: ../drivers/clk/ti/clock.h:265:5: note: expected ‘ti_of_clk_init_cb_t {aka void (*)(struct clk_hw *, struct device_n > ode *)}’ but argument is of type ‘void (*)(void *, struct device_node *)’ > int ti_clk_retry_init(struct device_node *node, struct clk_hw *hw, > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > make[4]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:329: drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.o] Error 1 > make[3]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:587: drivers/clk/ti] Error 2 > make[2]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:587: drivers/clk] Error 2 > make[1]: *** [/home/drue/src/linux/4.14-rc/Makefile:1031: drivers] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/drue/src/linux/4.14-rc/build-arm' > make: *** [Makefile:146: sub-make] Error 2 > >
You are right. Difference in my build is that my version of gcc doesn't produce and error but just a warning.
Guenter
| |