lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patches in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [tip:x86/mm] x86/tme: Detect if TME and MKTME is activated by BIOS
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 03:12:02PM +1300, Kai Huang wrote:
> It seems setup_pku() will call get_cpu_cap to restore c->x86_phys_bits
> later? In which case I think you need to change setup_pku as well.

Thanks for catching this.

I think setup_pku() shouldn't call get_cpu_cap().

Any objections against this:

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 348cf4821240..ce10d8ae4cd6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -362,6 +362,8 @@ static bool pku_disabled;

static __always_inline void setup_pku(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
+ u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
+
/* check the boot processor, plus compile options for PKU: */
if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_PKU))
return;
@@ -377,7 +379,8 @@ static __always_inline void setup_pku(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
* cpuid bit to be set. We need to ensure that we
* update that bit in this CPU's "cpu_info".
*/
- get_cpu_cap(c);
+ cpuid_count(0x00000007, 0, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+ c->x86_capability[CPUID_7_ECX] = ecx;
}

#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
> And for the comments here, I think it can be refined. It is true that
> VM guest needs to know bits of physical address, but this info is not
> used only by VM. I think the reason we need to update is this is simply
> the fact.

Fair enough. Like this?

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index e8ddc6dcfd53..ac45ba7398d9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -612,11 +612,8 @@ static void detect_tme(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
#endif

/*
- * Exclude KeyID bits from physical address bits.
- *
- * We have to do this even if we are not going to use KeyID bits
- * ourself. VM guests still have to know that these bits are not usable
- * for physical address.
+ * KeyID bits effectively lower number of physical address bits.
+ * Let's update cpuinfo_x86::x86_phys_bits to reflect the fact.
*/
c->x86_phys_bits -= keyid_bits;
}
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-03-13 13:51    [W:0.088 / U:3.560 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site