[lkml]   [2018]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6] Add SPDX license tag check
On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Igor Stoppa <> wrote:
> On 02/02/18 21:06, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 12:27 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Igor Stoppa <> wrote:
>>>> On 02/02/18 17:40, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>> Add SPDX license tag check based on the rules defined in
>>>> Shouldn't it also check that the license is compatible?
>>> Perhaps we shouldn't try to script legal advice.
>> True.
>> I believe what was meant was that the
>> entry was a valid SPDX License entry
>> that already exists as a specific file
>> in the LICENSES/ path.
> I expect that there is a finite number of compatible licenses.
> Maybe I'm too optimistic about what can be taken as legal advice or not,
> but I would expect that a warning about unmatched license type does not
> constitute legal advice.
> Is it too optimistic? :-D

That's very reasonable IMHO and this not legal advice alright to me.
This would be just a tool that warns you that your license expression
does not match known licenses in the kernel.

Philippe Ombredanne

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-02-08 15:46    [W:0.222 / U:0.840 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site