[lkml]   [2018]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Coccinelle: zalloc-simple: Checking consistency for SmPL rules
>> * Do we agree that a proper size determination is essential for every
>> condition in the discussed SmPL rules together with forwarding
>> this information?
> No. I don't mind a few false positives.

Do you care to split SmPL rules by their confidence category in such an use case?


 \ /
  Last update: 2018-02-03 08:24    [W:0.053 / U:0.548 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site