lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] of: cache phandle nodes to decrease cost of of_find_node_by_phandle()
From
Date
On 02/01/18 21:59, Chintan Pandya wrote:
>
>
> On 2/2/2018 12:40 AM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 02/01/18 02:31, Chintan Pandya wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Anyways, will fix this locally and share test results.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, I look forward to the results.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Set up for this time was slightly different. So, taken all the numbers again.
>>>
>>> Boot to shell time (in ms): Experiment 2
>>> [1] Base            : 14.843805 14.784842 14.842338
>>> [2] 64 sized fixed cache    : 14.189292 14.200003 14.266711
>>> [3] Dynamic freeable cache    : 14.112412 14.064772 14.036052
>>>
>>> So, [3] (this patch) looks to be improving 750ms (on avg from base build).
>>>
>>
>> Is this with the many debug options enabled?  If so, can you repeat with
>> a normal configuration?
>
> Could you share me the point of doing this experiment in perf mode ?


You had mentioned earlier in another thread:

My recent results were taken on debug_defconfig which has many performance
slowing code. So, gap between base-build and w/ the test patches would be
more than the actual production build.

If you measure a large performance gain with a debug configuration, that
may not represent the actual gain you will get with a production
configuration, as you noted.

My question was trying to determine whether the numbers reported above
are for a debug configuration or a production configuration. And if
not a production configuration, I was requesting the numbers for a
production configuration. If the production configuration does not
show a significant boot time reduction from the patch then there is
less justification for adding complexity to the existing code. I
prefer to use simpler data structures and algorithms __if__ extra
complexity does not provide any advantage. The balance between
complexity and benefits is a core software engineering issue.


> I don't have a set up for taking these numbers in perf mode. For
> that, I need to ask some other team and round trip follow ups. In my
> set up, I rely on serial console logging which gets disabled in perf
> mode.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Frank
>>
>
> Chintan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-02-02 22:26    [W:0.065 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site