[lkml]   [2018]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] perf tools: Fix period/freq terms setup
Em Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:28:49PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 10:45:46AM -0800, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> > Otherwise, I tested what you have written so far and it works.

> So I take that as a Tested-by: Stephane and will apply the patches, Jiri
> can continue working on these other aspects, right?

I also added this for the casual reader to get up to speed more quickly,
please check that it makes sense.

Committer note:

When we use -c or a period=N term in the event definition, then we don't
need to ask the kernel, via perf_event_attr.sample_type |=
PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD, to put the event period in each sample, as we know
it already, it is in perf_event_attr.sample_period.

- Arnaldo

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-02-02 21:40    [W:0.110 / U:37.728 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site