lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: plan9 semantics on Linux - mount namespaces
    From
    Date
    On 14.02.2018 18:50, Richard Weinberger wrote:

    >> hmm, now it works, but only when strace'ing it.
    >> that's really strange.
    >
    > On my box, with my patch applied, also busybox works now.

    hmm, w/o strace, too ?
    Which version are you using ? I've got 1.27.2

    >> But still I wonder whether user_ns really solves my problem, as I don't
    >> want to create sandboxed users, but only private namespaces just like
    >> on Plan9.
    >
    > Well, I'd be surprised if that works out of the box.
    > Since you're posting on LKML I assumed you're hacking the kernel to support
    > plan9-alike namespaces...

    Yes, that's the plan :)


    --mtx

    --
    Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
    Free software and Linux embedded engineering
    info@metux.net -- +49-151-27565287

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2018-02-14 19:02    [W:2.485 / U:0.168 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site