lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/6] x86/speculation: Update Speculation Control microcode blacklist
    On Mon, 12 Feb 2018, David Woodhouse wrote:

    > On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 23:39 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
    > >
    > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
    > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
    > > @@ -123,8 +123,6 @@ static const struct sku_microcode
    > > spectre_bad_microcodes[] = {
    > >         { INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_MOBILE,   0x09,   0x84 },
    > >         { INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X,         0x03,   0x0100013e },
    > >         { INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X,         0x04,   0x0200003c },
    > > -       { INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_MOBILE,    0x03,   0xc2 },
    > > -       { INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_DESKTOP,   0x03,   0xc2 },
    > >         { INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_CORE,    0x04,   0x28 },
    > >         { INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_GT3E,    0x01,   0x1b },
    > >         { INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_XEON_D,  0x02,   0x14 },
    >
    > Arjan points out that the SKYLAKE_DESKTOP one there is premature. There
    > are *two* rows in Intel's table which match that CPUID (506E3).
    >
    > Only *one* of them ("Skylake H/S") has cleared the 0xC2 microcode for
    > use, while the "Skylake E3" line still doesn't approve it. (But doesn't
    > explicitly list it in the "STOP deploying" column any more either,
    > which it probably should, and might have helped me notice.)
    >
    > Ingo, Thomas: do you want to drop this patch which is already in
    > tip/x86/pti and have a new version with the SKYLAKE_DESKTOP no longer
    > removed? Or shall I send an incremental patch to add it back?

    Delta patch please.
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2018-02-12 15:33    [W:3.370 / U:0.076 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site