lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/3] binder: fix sparse warnings on locking context
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 08:37:41AM -0800, Todd Kjos wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:51 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 03:19:24PM -0800, Todd Kjos wrote:
> > > Add __acquire()/__release() annnotations to fix warnings
> > > in sparse context checking
> > >
> > > There is one case where the warning was due to a lack of
> > > a "default:" case in a switch statement where a lock was
> > > being released in each of the cases, so the default
> > > case was added.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2: no change, just resubmitted as #1 of 3 patches instead of by itself
> >
> > I've already applied this one, right?
>
> No, not yet. I confused you by failing to add the "v2" in the subject
> for the other two submitted with it that you applied this morning:
>
> binder: filter out nodes when showing binder procs
> binder: fix kerneldoc header for struct binder_buffer
>
> Sorry about the confusion. This one still needs to be applied.

But I thought I applied this back on November 26:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git/commit/?h=char-misc-testing&id=324fa64cf4189094bc4df744a9e7214a1b81d845

You should have gotten an email from my scripts at that time.

or is this somehow a different patch with the same commit log?
Or a v2 that changed from the one that I had applied? Do I need to
revert this one and apply your new one?

confused,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-12-07 08:08    [W:0.090 / U:1.084 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site