lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v3 11/24] locking/lockdep: Remove a superfluous INIT_LIST_HEAD() statement
Date
Initializing a list entry just before it is passed to list_add_tail_rcu()
is not necessary because list_add_tail_rcu() overwrites the next and prev
pointers anyway. Hence remove the INIT_LIST_HEAD() statement.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 81388d028ac7..346b5a1fd062 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -792,7 +792,6 @@ register_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int force)
class->key = key;
class->name = lock->name;
class->subclass = subclass;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->lock_entry);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->locks_before);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->locks_after);
class->name_version = count_matching_names(class);
--
2.20.0.rc2.403.gdbc3b29805-goog
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-12-07 02:15    [W:0.099 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site