Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 4 Dec 2018 19:59:08 +0900 | From | Sergey Senozhatsky <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] printk: don't unconditionally shortcut print_time() |
| |
On (12/04/18 19:06), Tetsuo Handa wrote: > On 2018/12/04 11:56, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > Can we please have something better than 'f'? > > OK. To pass 80 column limit, one line increased. ;-)
Ah, so that was the reason :)
[..]
> To close this race, get a snapshot value of printk_time and pass it to > SYSLOG_ACTION_READ, SYSLOG_ACTION_READ_ALL, SYSLOG_ACTION_SIZE_UNREAD and > kmsg_dump_get_buffer(). > > Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> > Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> > Acked-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
-ss
| |