lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Dec]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/3] clk: ti: check clock type before doing autoidle ops
* Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> [181227 20:13]:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 08:45:57 -0800
> Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>
> > * Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> [181204 06:17]:
> > > On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 07:39:10 -0800
> > > Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > > > The consumer device stays active just fine with PM runtime
> > > > calls. So yes, the problem is keeping a clock controller forced
> > > > active for the period of consumer device reset. Other than
> > > > that typically autoidle can be just kept enabled.
> > > >
> > > Are we still talking about the same problem? Maybe I am losing track
> > > here. Just to make sure.
> > > The patch series was about disabling autoidle for devices which cannot
> > > work with it during normal operation. Not during reset or something
> > > like that.
> > > Or is the keep-clock-active-during-reset just a requirement for bigger
> > > restructuring ideas?
> >
> > Yeah there are two issues: The fix needed for the issue you brought up,
> > and also how to let a reset driver to block autoidle for reset.
> >
> Hmm, is this set now waiting for the famous "somebody" fixing all
> the stuff?

Well I think we're still waiting on Tero to comment on this.

> What are currently visible symptoms for the driver not blocking
> autoidle for reset? Maybe I can at least test something there. I have
> also omap5 here.

Oh that's just for making drivers/reset drivers to work in
the long run. Let's keep that separate from these fixes..

Regards,

Tony


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-12-28 21:02    [W:0.086 / U:0.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site