Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 21 Dec 2018 14:29:09 -0500 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [for-next][PATCH 06/24] sparc64: Use ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack() instead of curr_ret_stack |
| |
On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 10:24:14 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 12:56:24 -0500 > > > From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > > > The structure of the ret_stack array on the task struct is going to > > change, and accessing it directly via the curr_ret_stack index will no > > longer give the ret_stack entry that holds the return address. To access > > that, architectures must now use ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack() to get the > > associated ret_stack that matches the saved return address. > > > > Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Thanks David!
-- Steve
| |