Messages in this thread | | | From | <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] regulator: mcp16502: Use #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP around mcp16502_suspend/resume_noirq | Date | Fri, 21 Dec 2018 11:17:50 +0000 |
| |
On 20/12/2018 at 14:14, Axel Lin wrote: > mcp16502_suspend/resume_noirq is only used by SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS > when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is defined. > So use #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP instead CONFIG_SUSPEND guard. > > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
I'm not against this patch and don't know the habits about this... one remark below...
> --- > This patch replaces below patch I sent today. > regulator: mcp16502: Fix build error when !CONFIG_SUSPEND && CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > Changed the subject line because after commit 308144ce8e51 ("regulator: mcp16502: code cleanup") > it's not related to build error now. > > drivers/regulator/mcp16502.c | 7 ++----- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/mcp16502.c b/drivers/regulator/mcp16502.c > index 809a664733a4..cb11fb206899 100644 > --- a/drivers/regulator/mcp16502.c > +++ b/drivers/regulator/mcp16502.c > @@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ static int mcp16502_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > return 0; > } > > -#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
Why not use CONFIG_PM just like ...
> static int mcp16502_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev) > { > struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev); > @@ -517,10 +517,7 @@ static int mcp16502_resume_noirq(struct device *dev) > > return 0; > } > -#else /* !CONFIG_SUSPEND */ > -#define mcp16502_suspend_noirq NULL > -#define mcp16502_resume_noirq NULL > -#endif /* !CONFIG_SUSPEND */ > +#endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_PM
... here.... or unify both directives to "CONFIG_PM_SLEEP" ?
Otherwise, no problem in adding my: Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
(as Andrei is not with Microchip anymore).
> static const struct dev_pm_ops mcp16502_pm_ops = { >
-- Nicolas Ferre
| |