Messages in this thread | | | From | Nadav Amit <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] x86/alternatives: use temporary mm for text poking | Date | Mon, 5 Nov 2018 18:04:42 +0000 |
| |
From: Peter Zijlstra Sent: November 5, 2018 at 1:30:41 PM GMT > To: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] x86/alternatives: use temporary mm for text poking > > > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 04:29:45PM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote: >> + unuse_temporary_mm(prev); >> + >> + pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl); > > That; that does kunmap_atomic() on 32bit. > > I've been thinking that the whole kmap_atomic thing on x86_32 is > terminally broken, and with that most of x86_32 is. > > kmap_atomic does the per-cpu fixmap pte fun-and-games we're here saying > is broken. Yes, only the one CPU will (explicitly) use those fixmap PTEs > and thus the local invalidate _should_ work. However nothing prohibits > speculation on another CPU from using our fixmap addresses. Which can > lead to the remote CPU populating its TLBs for our fixmap entry. > > And, as we've found, there are AMD parts that #MC when there are > mis-matched TLB entries. > > So what do we do? mark x86_32 SMP broken?
pte_unmap() seems to only use kunmap_atomic() when CONFIG_HIGHPTE is set, no?
Do most distributions run with CONFIG_HIGHPTE?
| |