lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: USB-C device hotplug issue
From
Date
On 26.10.2018 17:07, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2018, Dennis Wassenberg wrote:
>
>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
>>>> @@ -2815,7 +2815,9 @@ static int hub_port_reset(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1,
>>>> USB_PORT_FEAT_C_BH_PORT_RESET);
>>>> usb_clear_port_feature(hub->hdev, port1,
>>>> USB_PORT_FEAT_C_PORT_LINK_STATE);
>>>> - usb_clear_port_feature(hub->hdev, port1,
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!warm)
>>>> + usb_clear_port_feature(hub->hdev, port1,
>>>> USB_PORT_FEAT_C_CONNECTION);
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>
>>> The key fact is that connection events can get lost if they happen to
>>> occur during a port reset.
>> Yes.
>>>
>>> I'm not entirely certain of the logic here, but it looks like the
>>> correct test to add should be "if (udev != NULL)", not "if (!warm)".
>>> Perhaps Mathias can confirm this

Sorry about the late response, got distracted while performing git
archeology.

"if (udev != NULL)" would seem more reasonable.

Logs show that clearing the FEAT_C_CONNECTION was originally added
after a hot reset failed, and before issuing a warm reset to a SS.Inactive
link. (see 10d674a USB: When hot reset for USB3 fails, try warm reset.)

Apparently all the change flags needed to be cleared for some specific
host + device combination before issuing a warm reset for the enumeration
to work properly.

The change to always clear FEAT_C_CONNECTION for USB3 was done later in patch:
a24a607 USB: Rip out recursive call on warm port reset.

Motivation was:

"In hub_port_finish_reset, unconditionally clear the connect status
change (CSC) bit for USB 3.0 hubs when the port reset is done. If we
had to issue multiple warm resets for a device, that bit may have been
set if the device went into SS.Inactive and then was successfully warm
reset."

>> I don't know if clearing the USB_PORT_FEAT_C_CONNECTION bit is
>> correct in case of a non warm reset. In my case I always observed a
>> warm reset because of the link state change.
>> Thats why I checked the warm variable to not change the behavoir for
>> cases a didn't checked for the first shot.
>
> (The syntax of that last sentence is pretty mangled; I can't understand
> it.)
>
> Think of it this way:
>
> If a device was not attached before the reset, we don't want
> to clear the connect-change status because then we wouldn't
> recognize a device that was plugged in during the reset.
>
> If a device was attached before the reset, we don't want any
> connect-change status which might be provoked by the reset to
> last, because we don't want the core to think that the device
> was unplugged and replugged when all that happened was a reset.
>
> So the important criterion is whether or not a device was attached to
> the port when the reset started. It's something of a coincidence that
> you only observe warm resets when there's nothing attached.
>
>> During the first run of usb_hub_reset the udev is NULL because in
>> this situation the device is not attached logically.
>>
>> [ 112.889810] usb 4-1-port1: XXX: port_event: portstatus: 0x2c0, portchange: 0x40!
>> [ 113.201192] usb 4-1-port1: XXX: hub_port_reset: udev: (nil)!
>> [ 113.201198] usb 4-1-port1: XXX: hub_port_reset (not clearing USB_PORT_FEAT_C_CONNECTION): 0x203, portchange: 0x1!
>> [ 113.253612] usb 4-1-port1: XXX: port_event: portstatus: 0x203, portchange: 0x1!
>> [ 113.377208] usb 4-1-port1: XXX: hub_port_reset: udev: ffff88046b302800!
>> [ 113.377214] usb 4-1-port1: XXX: hub_port_reset (not clearing USB_PORT_FEAT_C_CONNECTION): 0x203, portchange: 0x0!
>> [ 113.429478] usb 4-1.1: new SuperSpeed USB device number 7 using xhci_hcd
>> [ 113.442370] usb 4-1.1: New USB device found, idVendor=0781, idProduct=5596
>> [ 113.442376] usb 4-1.1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
>> [ 113.442381] usb 4-1.1: Product: Ultra T C
>> [ 113.442385] usb 4-1.1: Manufacturer: SanDisk
>> [ 113.442388] usb 4-1.1: SerialNumber: 4C530001131013121031
>>
>> Or maybe we can skip clearing the USB_PORT_FEAT_C_CONNECTION bit in
>> case of hub_port_reset completely without any other check?
>
> See above.

Checking for udev sounds reasonable to me.
Not sure if we should worry about the specific host+device combo that needed flags
cleared before warm reset. See patch:

10d674a USB: When hot reset for USB3 fails, try warm reset.
https://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=131603549603799&w=2

-Mathias

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-05 16:32    [W:0.100 / U:0.772 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site