Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC 0/3] Unify CPU topology across ARM64 & RISC-V | From | Jeffrey Hugo <> | Date | Tue, 20 Nov 2018 08:28:18 -0700 |
| |
On 11/20/2018 4:11 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:31:33AM -0700, Jeffrey Hugo wrote: > > [...] > >> >> I was interested in testing these on QDF2400, an ARM64 platform, since this >> series touches core ARM64 code and I'd hate to see a regression. However, I >> can't figure out what baseline to use to apply these. Different patches >> cause different conflicts of a variety of baselines I attempted. >> > > Good to know that we can test DT configuration on QDF2400. I always assumed > it's ACPI only.
It is ACPI only in the production configuration. I suppose we could hack things up to do basic DT sanity, but I expect it would be nasty and non-trivial.
> >> What are these intended to apply to? >> > > The series alone may not get the package/socket ids correct on QDF2400. > I have not yet added support for the same as I wanted to get the initial > feedback on DT bindings. The movement of DT binding and corresponding > code should not regress and you should be able to validate only that > part. >
On a cursory glance, it looks like some of the reorganized code would also be used in the ACPI path (things that are common between DT and ACPI). I do not expect problems, but I still feel its prudent to do a sanity check on actual hardware.
-- Jeffrey Hugo Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
| |