lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PULL] vhost: cleanups and fixes
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 10:10 AM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Don't you take over the VM with "use_mm()" when you do the copies? So
> yes, it's a kernel thread, but it has a user VM, and though that
> should have the user limits.

Oooh. *Just* as I sent this, I realized that "use_mm()" doesn't update
the thread addr_limit.

That actually looks like a bug to me - although one that you've
apparently been aware of and worked around.

Wouldn't it be nicer to just make "use_mm()" do

set_fs(USER_DS);

instead? And undo it on unuse_mm()?

And, in fact, maybe we should default kernel threads to have a zero
address limit, so that they can't do any user accesses at all without
doing this?

Adding Al to the cc, because I think he's been looking at set_fs() in general.

Linus

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-02 18:17    [W:0.078 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site