lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: Qemu Guest kernel 4.20-rc1 PCIe hotplug issue
Date

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com
> [mailto:mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: 13 November 2018 12:59
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Wangzhou (B)
> <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>; Lukas
> Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> Subject: Re: Qemu Guest kernel 4.20-rc1 PCIe hotplug issue
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:36:20PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
> > > @@ -156,9 +156,9 @@ static void pcie_do_write_cmd(struct controller
> > > *ctrl,
> > > u16 cmd,
> > > slot_ctrl |= (cmd & mask);
> > > ctrl->cmd_busy = 1;
> > > smp_mb();
> > > + ctrl->slot_ctrl = slot_ctrl;
> >
> > Actually I tried this one, but it doesn't help in this case as the
> > initial
> > pcie_capability_read_word() returns the slot_ctrl without
> > PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_HPIE bit set. It looks to me
> > pcie_enable_notification() function enables this,
> >
> > if (!pciehp_poll_mode)
> > cmd |= PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_HPIE | PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_CCIE;
> >
> > I don't know this is as per the spec or not as the initial cap read
> > doesn't seems to have the PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_HPIE bit set.
>
> If I read the code right cmd value should end up in ctrl->slot_ctrl properly from
> pcie_enable_notification().

Right. As I mentioned in my previous mail, I missed the fact that you are updating
the ctrl->slot_ctrl with cmd value while in my test I did my update with the value
returned by pcie_capability_read_word().

> However, I think we are missing check for PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_CCIE in
> pciehp_isr().

Ok.

> Here's an updated patch, can you try and see if it makes any difference?

I just tried this and it works. Thanks.

See few comments below.

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> index 7dd443aea5a5..da2cbe892444 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> @@ -156,9 +156,9 @@ static void pcie_do_write_cmd(struct controller *ctrl,
> u16 cmd,
> slot_ctrl |= (cmd & mask);
> ctrl->cmd_busy = 1;
> smp_mb();
> + ctrl->slot_ctrl = slot_ctrl;

Does it make more sense if we can move this before smp_mb()?. Also I am not
sure updating the ctrl->slot_ctrl before actually the hardware is programmed
with that value will result in any other race conditions? TBH, I am not that familiar
with this code and I leave that to you :)

Thanks,
Shameer

> pcie_capability_write_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, slot_ctrl);
> ctrl->cmd_started = jiffies;
> - ctrl->slot_ctrl = slot_ctrl;
>
> /*
> * Controllers with the Intel CF118 and similar errata advertise @@ -
> 522,7 +522,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pciehp_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> * in the Slot Control register (PCIe r4.0, sec 6.7.3.4).
> */
> if (pdev->current_state == PCI_D3cold ||
> - (!(ctrl->slot_ctrl & PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_HPIE) && !pciehp_poll_mode))
> + (!(ctrl->slot_ctrl & (PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_HPIE | PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_CCIE))
> +&& !pciehp_poll_mode))
> return IRQ_NONE;
>
> /*

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-13 14:28    [W:0.061 / U:3.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site