lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 1/6] tpm: dynamically allocate active_banks array
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 02:34:39PM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> On 11/8/2018 2:46 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Orrayn Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 04:01:54PM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > > This patch removes the hard-coded limit of the active_banks array size.
> > > It stores in the tpm_chip structure the number of active PCR banks,
> > > determined in tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(), and replaces the static array
> > > with a pointer to a dynamically allocated array.
> > >
> > > As a consequence of the introduction of nr_active_banks, tpm_pcr_extend()
> > > does not check anymore if the algorithm stored in tpm_chip is equal to
> > > zero. The active_banks array always contains valid algorithms.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 1db15344f874 ("tpm: implement TPM 2.0 capability to get active
> > > PCR banks")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 1 +
> > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 3 ++-
> > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 17 ++++++++---------
> > > 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> > > index 46caadca916a..2a9e8b744436 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> > > @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ static void tpm_dev_release(struct device *dev)
> > > kfree(chip->log.bios_event_log);
> > > kfree(chip->work_space.context_buf);
> > > kfree(chip->work_space.session_buf);
> > > + kfree(chip->active_banks);
> > > kfree(chip);
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> > > index 1a803b0cf980..ba7ca6b3e664 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> > > @@ -1039,8 +1039,7 @@ static int tpm1_pcr_extend(struct tpm_chip *chip, int pcr_idx, const u8 *hash,
> > > int tpm_pcr_extend(struct tpm_chip *chip, int pcr_idx, const u8 *hash)
> > > {
> > > int rc;
> > > - struct tpm2_digest digest_list[ARRAY_SIZE(chip->active_banks)];
> > > - u32 count = 0;
> > > + struct tpm2_digest *digest_list;
> > > int i;
> > > chip = tpm_find_get_ops(chip);
> > > @@ -1048,16 +1047,22 @@ int tpm_pcr_extend(struct tpm_chip *chip, int pcr_idx, const u8 *hash)
> > > return -ENODEV;
> >
> > Should take digest_list as input. Probably callers could re-use the
> > same digest_list array multiple times?
> >
> > Move struct tpm_chip to include/linux/tpm.h so that the caller can query
> > nr_active_banks and active_banks and can create the digest array by
> > itself. Lets do this right at once now that this is being restructured.
>
> I have to move also other structures and #define. Wouldn't be better to
> introduce a new function to pass to the caller active_banks and
> nr_active_banks?

Revisited. I think it is fine how it is for now and we reconsider
later. Only thing I want to remark is that use should use kcalloc()
instead of kalloc_array() + memset().

/Jarkko

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-11-13 18:05    [W:0.099 / U:3.620 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site